Skip to main content

 

When choosing a method to sell a property, it’s critical to select the platform that best suits your goals, timeline, and the condition of your property. This article clearly outlines the differences between MLS and Investorlift, using specific, well-structured insights to help you make an informed decision.

 

Platform Suitability Based on Property Condition

 

Each platform is designed for different types of property conditions and seller objectives.

  • MLS:

    • Best suited for retail-ready homes

    • Homes should be clean, updated, and visually appealing

    • Appropriate for traditional homebuyers seeking move-in-ready residences

  • Investorlift:

    • Optimized for distressed, fixer-upper, or off-market properties

    • Ideal for sellers looking for quick, no-hassle transactions

    • Commonly used for properties not suitable for conventional lending

 

Expected Timeline for Completing a Sale

 

Sales timelines differ significantly between MLS and Investorlift.

  • MLS:

    • Sales typically take weeks to several months

    • Delays may arise due to inspections, buyer mortgage approvals, and appraisal processes

  • Investorlift:

    • Properties are often sold within hours to a few days

    • Fast turnaround made possible by cash buyers and minimal due diligence

 

Types of Buyers

 

The buyer demographics vary depending on the platform.

  • MLS:

    • Attracts retail buyers, including individuals and families

    • Also accessible to investors, though not the primary audience

  • Investorlift:

    • Exclusively targets real estate investors

    • Buyers are typically looking for value-add opportunities, flips, or rental assets

 

Procedural Requirements for Showings, Inspections, and Contingencies

 

MLS and Investorlift differ in their procedural complexity and seller requirements.

  • MLS:

    • Involves in-person showings, home inspections, and finance contingencies

    • May include repairs and negotiations before closing

  • Investorlift:

    • No showings or inspections required

    • Properties are sold as-is with no contingencies, streamlining the closing process

 

Commission Costs Associated With Each Selling Method

 

The cost of commissions directly impacts the seller’s net proceeds.

  • MLS:

    • Sellers typically pay 4–6% in agent commissions

    • Commission is split between listing and buyer agents

  • Investorlift:

    • No commission fees

    • Sellers retain full sale proceeds without agent involvement

 

Bank Financing Eligibility

 

Financing options for buyers differ depending on the platform.

  • MLS:

    • Properties are generally bank financeable

    • Suitable for buyers using conventional, FHA, or VA loans

  • Investorlift:

    • Not bank financeable

    • Transactions are funded through cash or private lending sources

 

Summary Table: Feature Comparison

 

 

 

Feature MLS Investorlift
Ideal for Retail-ready homes Fixers / distressed / fast sales
Time to sell Weeks to months Hours to days
Buyer type Retail buyers / Investors Investors only
Showings & Inspections Required? Yes No
Finance Contingencies? Yes No
Agent Commissions 4–6% $0
Bank Financeable? Yes No

 

 

Contact Support

 

If you still have questions or encounter issues, we're here to help.

Contact Us:


🗣️Your feedback is valuable to us! Scroll down and let us know if this content was helpful to you. Every rating helps us make our Help Center better for you.

This Great love the break down!!


Don’t disagree with anything here. There is just one addition related to the buyers, there is a segment of investors who have no interest in prospecting for deals themselves and instead rely upon traditional agents to find their projects on the MLS. With investorlift’s data (God mode) we can find them, but as others may have experienced when I have called these investors directly they just refer me to their agent. And some of those agents are open to a discussion and others can’t see the forest through the trees.


Reply